<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Critique of the Role of Revolutionary Organization</title>
	<link>http://anarchowhat.blogsome.com/2006/12/20/a-critique-of-the-role-of-revolutionary-organization/</link>
	<description>yes, this is what I do for fun</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 15:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Nate</title>
		<link>http://anarchowhat.blogsome.com/2006/12/20/a-critique-of-the-role-of-revolutionary-organization/#comment-56</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 04:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://anarchowhat.blogsome.com/2006/12/20/a-critique-of-the-role-of-revolutionary-organization/#comment-56</guid>
					<description>That depends on who you ask, really. I'm out to lunch on that. Personally I'm a continue-ist, generally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>That depends on who you ask, really. I&#8217;m out to lunch on that. Personally I&#8217;m a continue-ist, generally.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Administrator</title>
		<link>http://anarchowhat.blogsome.com/2006/12/20/a-critique-of-the-role-of-revolutionary-organization/#comment-31</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 18:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://anarchowhat.blogsome.com/2006/12/20/a-critique-of-the-role-of-revolutionary-organization/#comment-31</guid>
					<description>Distribution is distinct from consumption though right? I should just read it :) My second hand understanding of it though was that fordism changed the role of consumption in society (through using it to let steam off struggles). Is that wrong?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Distribution is distinct from consumption though right? I should just read it <img src='http://anarchowhat.blogsome.com/wp-images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  My second hand understanding of it though was that fordism changed the role of consumption in society (through using it to let steam off struggles). Is that wrong?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Nate</title>
		<link>http://anarchowhat.blogsome.com/2006/12/20/a-critique-of-the-role-of-revolutionary-organization/#comment-28</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 07:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://anarchowhat.blogsome.com/2006/12/20/a-critique-of-the-role-of-revolutionary-organization/#comment-28</guid>
					<description>It's actually the Marx thing I was trying to get folks to read w/ me a little bit ago, the unpublished and partially unfinished introduction to A Contribution To A Critique of Political Economy. It's in the Grundrisse right at the beginning, p80 or so I think, I think it's the first thing after the translator's intro, it's about 30 pages long or so, if that. That link I put in my last comment is the whole of this introduction. The best part in my opinion is where he says that there's a distribution which is just as important as production, which is the distribution of class positions and of people into class positions. That's really amenable to how I think we want to read primitive accumulation and the role of the state. 
g'nite,
n8</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>It&#8217;s actually the Marx thing I was trying to get folks to read w/ me a little bit ago, the unpublished and partially unfinished introduction to A Contribution To A Critique of Political Economy. It&#8217;s in the Grundrisse right at the beginning, p80 or so I think, I think it&#8217;s the first thing after the translator&#8217;s intro, it&#8217;s about 30 pages long or so, if that. That link I put in my last comment is the whole of this introduction. The best part in my opinion is where he says that there&#8217;s a distribution which is just as important as production, which is the distribution of class positions and of people into class positions. That&#8217;s really amenable to how I think we want to read primitive accumulation and the role of the state.<br />
g&#8217;nite,<br />
n8
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: todd</title>
		<link>http://anarchowhat.blogsome.com/2006/12/20/a-critique-of-the-role-of-revolutionary-organization/#comment-26</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2006 23:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://anarchowhat.blogsome.com/2006/12/20/a-critique-of-the-role-of-revolutionary-organization/#comment-26</guid>
					<description>What part of the grundrisse? Or the whole thing? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>What part of the grundrisse? Or the whole thing?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Nate</title>
		<link>http://anarchowhat.blogsome.com/2006/12/20/a-critique-of-the-role-of-revolutionary-organization/#comment-22</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2006 02:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://anarchowhat.blogsome.com/2006/12/20/a-critique-of-the-role-of-revolutionary-organization/#comment-22</guid>
					<description>I'll read the AF doc then respond to this. For now, re: the relationship of production and consumption, you might be interested in the intro to the Grundrisse, http://marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1857/grundrisse/ch01.htm 

Marx is pretty good here on the interconnections between all these, better than many marxists. 

happy new year!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I&#8217;ll read the AF doc then respond to this. For now, re: the relationship of production and consumption, you might be interested in the intro to the Grundrisse, <a href='http://marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1857/grundrisse/ch01.htm' rel='nofollow'>http://marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1857/grundrisse/ch01.htm</a> </p>
	<p>Marx is pretty good here on the interconnections between all these, better than many marxists. </p>
	<p>happy new year!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
